Back to Sport

Dallas’ Missed Threes Deserve a Closer Look Than the Percentage

The Mavericks’ preseason loss to New Orleans exposed spacing and pressure problems, but one poor perimeter night does not erase the value of creating open shots before the defense settles.

Emmett Hollis

October 15, 20263 min read

NBAFinal
New Orleans Pelicans101
Dallas Mavericks97

October 15, 2026

A 10-for-49 night from 3-point range can make a reasonable basketball philosophy look rather silly. The Dallas Mavericks should resist that conclusion after Wednesday’s 101-97 preseason loss to the New Orleans Pelicans at American Airlines Center.

The more useful question concerns the quality of those attempts before anyone judges the volume. Sergio de Larrea’s assessment was that most of Dallas’ 49 threes resembled the shots the team wants, especially the opportunities created early in possessions. That judgment deserves weight. An open three taken before a defense is organized remains a valuable attempt, even when the ball declines to cooperate.

Dallas wants to play quickly and create advantages before the floor fills with defenders. Passing up a clean early look can leave the offense working against a settled defense several seconds later, with fewer driving lanes and less room for the next pass. The idea is sound. The execution Wednesday occasionally looked like the idea had been left alone in the building.

New Orleans supplied the complication. Dallas committed 27 turnovers, and the Pelicans turned those giveaways into 27 points. They also scored 23 points in transition to Dallas’ eight. Coach Dusty May attributed part of the trouble to illegal screens, limited offensive variety and drives launched into poor spacing. He credited New Orleans’ physical pressure with speeding the Mavericks up as well.

May’s spacing criticism provides a necessary check on de Larrea’s favorable view of the attempts. The coach and guard were describing different parts of the same offense: the intent to find early open shots, and possessions that went wrong under pressure. Both assessments can be useful. Dallas needs to keep creating the looks it wants while giving the ballhandler enough room to reach them.

Zaccharie Risacher offered the clearest individual counterpoint. He scored six points, went 3-for-11 from the field and missed all seven of his attempts from outside. Seven misses require no creative accounting.

May also credited Herbert Jones and New Orleans’ physical defense for making Risacher’s night difficult, a significant detail rather than a convenient excuse. A shooter can miss an uncontested attempt through ordinary variance; a defender can also keep a preferred look from ever becoming comfortable. The final line cannot answer that question by itself.

Dallas found better evidence for its approach during a fourth-quarter push. After Dallas trailed 75-63 through three periods, John Poulakidas made a 23-foot three, trimming the deficit to 77-66. De Larrea then hit from 26 feet with 7:40 remaining, making it 85-76. Tarik Biberovic’s 25-footer at the 2:17 mark reduced New Orleans’ lead to 95-89.

Those shots did not finish the comeback, but they showed how quickly the margin could change when a few perimeter attempts dropped. Dallas scored 34 points in the final quarter after producing 63 through the first three.

The rally involved more than shooting: the Mavericks went 27-for-32 at the foul line and stayed in the game through second chances generated by their work on the offensive glass. New Orleans answered with free throws and enough scoring around the basket to protect the lead.

The supporting numbers also explain why the final margin should be read carefully. Dallas’ bench supplied 70 of its 97 points. Poulakidas made four of eight threes and finished with 16 points, while Tobi Lawal scored 16 without a turnover. De Larrea added six assists during 30 minutes, though his five turnovers showed how much responsibility and pressure were packed into those possessions.

That combination can make a young group look both promising and unfinished in the same evening. Dallas created enough offense to threaten a comeback while giving New Orleans far too many chances to run. A poor shooting night became more damaging because the turnovers and fast-break deficit gave New Orleans extra returns on its pressure.

May’s spacing critique and de Larrea’s description of the open looks belong in the same review. The missed threes are clear enough; deciding which attempts to change requires understanding what happened before the release. Dallas should be able to improve the possessions without treating every missed jumper as a mistaken idea.

Sources

ESPN: box score and play-by-play

Source report

Share

Emmett Hollis

Emmett Hollis covers Howe high school sports and athletics across the area.

Related Stories

More in Weather